CO129-192 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [1-4] — Page 401

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

393

page 10 of the pamphlet) but having regard to the peculiarly scandalous character of the libel I declined to stop the prosecution.

4. After various attempts to quash the proceedings on technical and other grounds (reported on pages 4 to 24 of the pamphlet) the case was brought to trial on 8th and 9th June last.

5. Owing to the fact that the defendant certainly was, as in the libel he claims to be on terms of close friendship with His Excellency The Governor of the Colony and that The Attorney General, The Honble E L. O'Malley, was a guest at Government House at His Excellency's request, I, from feelings of delicacy, instructed my Solicitor, Mr. A. B. Johnson, who was also Crown Solicitor, to engage the services of Mr. I. G. Hayllar to conduct the prosecution.

6. In due course Mr Johnson requested The Attorney General to direct the Registrar of the Supreme Court to summon a special jury, which Mr O'Malley declined.

Application was then made to His Honor Chief Justice Sir John Smale to order a special jury with a view to having the case held as intelligently as possible, but His Honor declined, stating though he could make such an order he was not bound to. (In this connection I would call your Lordship's notice to His Honor's remarks reported on page 25 of the pamphlet marked D.)

7. The case was concluded on the 9th June 1880 and resulted in a verdict.

Counsel for the Defendant Quilty: His Honor the Chief Justice thereupon indicated to my Counsel Mr. Hayllar, a wish that he might be relieved from the duty of facing sentence by the prosecution consenting to forego punishment. This I refused to do.

And His Honor then sentenced the Defendant to pay a fine of fifty Dollars ($50).

8. Later in his summing up and in explanation of the leniency of his sentence His Honor commented upon a speech made by me at a public meeting of the Hong Kong Chamber of Commerce, referred to in the libel (marked I in page 34 of the pamphlet).

I very respectfully beg Your Lordship's special attention to these remarks of mine and to the correspondence relating thereto printed pages 44 to 49 of the pamphlet.

9. I have no hesitation in asserting that the remarks I made at the Chamber of Commerce were absolutely true and that they are well known in the Colony. Pitman has undoubted been on the most intimate and confidential terms with His Excellency The Governor.

Edit History

2026-05-22 07:44:46 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
393 page 10 of the pamphlet) but having regard to the peculiarly scandalous character of the libel I declined to stop the prosecution. 4. After various attempts to quash the proceedings on technical and other grounds (reported on pages 4 to 24 of the pamphlet) the case was brought to trial on 8th and 9th June last. 5. Owing to the fact that the defendant certainly was, as in the libel he claims to be on terms of close friendship with His Excellency The Governor of the Colony and that The Attorney General, The Honble E L. O'Malley, was a guest at Government House at His Excellency's request, I, from feelings of delicacy, instructed my Solicitor, Mr. A. B. Johnson, who was also Crown Solicitor, to engage the services of Mr. I. G. Hayllar to conduct the prosecution. 6. In due course Mr Johnson requested The Attorney General to direct the Registrar of the Supreme Court to summon a special jury, which Mr O'Malley declined. Application was then made to His Honor Chief Justice Sir John Smale to order a special jury with a view to having the case held as intelligently as possible, but His Honor declined, stating though he could make such an order he was not bound to. (In this connection I would call your Lordship's notice to His Honor's remarks reported on page 25 of the pamphlet marked D.) 7. The case was concluded on the 9th June 1880 and resulted in a verdict. Counsel for the Defendant Quilty: His Honor the Chief Justice thereupon indicated to my Counsel Mr. Hayllar, a wish that he might be relieved from the duty of facing sentence by the prosecution consenting to forego punishment. This I refused to do. And His Honor then sentenced the Defendant to pay a fine of fifty Dollars ($50). 8. Later in his summing up and in explanation of the leniency of his sentence His Honor commented upon a speech made by me at a public meeting of the Hong Kong Chamber of Commerce, referred to in the libel (marked I in page 34 of the pamphlet). I very respectfully beg Your Lordship's special attention to these remarks of mine and to the correspondence relating thereto printed pages 44 to 49 of the pamphlet. 9. I have no hesitation in asserting that the remarks I made at the Chamber of Commerce were absolutely true and that they are well known in the Colony. Pitman has undoubted been on the most intimate and confidential terms with His Excellency The Governor.
Baseline (Original)
393 page 10 of the pamphlet ) but having regard to the peculiarly scandalous character of the Libel I declined to stop the prosecution. 4. After various attempts to quash the proceedings on technical and other grounds/reported on pages 4 to 24 of the pamphlet) the case was brought to trial on 8th and 9th June lact. 5. Owing to the fact that the defendant certainly was, as in the Libel he claims to be on terms of close friendship with His Excellency The Governor of the Colony and that The Attorney General, The Houble E L. O'Malley, Excellency's living quest of His was a guest at Government House I from feelings of delicacy, instructed my Solicitor, Mr. A. 13. Johnson, who was also Crown Solicitor, to engage 6. services of of Mr. I. 6. Hayllar" to conduct the prosecution دیگری 20 the In due course Mr Johnson, requested The Attorney General to direct cistrar of the Supreme Court to the summon a special. to or malley declined jury, which Nur Application was then made to His Honor Chief Justice Sir John Smale to order a special with a view to having the case, held as intelligently possible, but His Horror dechiied? BLA stating though he could make such that an order he was not bound to. (In this connection I would call your Lordship's notice to His Honors remarks reported on, 25 of the pamphlet marked D. case was page concluded on the The 7. 9th June 1880 and resulted in a verdict. 1880 in a he Counsel of Quilty : His Horror the Chief Justice thereupon indicated to my Mr. Bayllar, a wish that he might be relieved from the duty of facing sentence. by the prosecution consenting to forego punishment This I refund to do and His Honor then sentenced the Defendant to pay a fine of fifty Dollars ($50). later In his summing up and on in explanation of the leniency of his sentence His Honor, commented upon. speech va de "call by me at a public meeting of the Hong Hong Chamber of Commerce, referred to in the Libel ( marked I in page 34 of the pamphlet ). I very respectfully Your Lordship's special attention to these remarks of mine and to the correspondence relating thereto printed pages 44 to 49 of the pamphlet avv 9. I have no hesitation in that the remarks I made at the Chamber of Commerce were asserting absolutely true and that they is well known in the Colony Pitman has undoubted. are do daly. nir been John on the most intimate and confidential The Governor, terms with His Excellency
2026-05-22 07:44:46 · Baseline
View content

393

page 10 of the pamphlet ) but having regard to the peculiarly scandalous character of the Libel I declined to stop the prosecution.

4. After various attempts to

quash the proceedings on technical and other grounds/reported on pages 4 to 24 of the pamphlet) the case was brought to trial on 8th and 9th June lact.

5. Owing to the fact that the defendant certainly was, as in the Libel he claims to be on terms of close friendship with His Excellency The Governor of the Colony and that The Attorney General, The Houble E L. O'Malley, Excellency's living

quest of His

was a guest

at Government House

I from feelings of delicacy, instructed my Solicitor, Mr. A. 13. Johnson, who was also Crown Solicitor, to

engage 6.

services of

of Mr. I. 6. Hayllar" to conduct the prosecution

دیگری

20

the

In due course Mr Johnson, requested The Attorney General to direct

cistrar of the Supreme Court to

the

summon a special.

to

or malley declined jury, which Nur

Application was then made to His Honor Chief Justice Sir John Smale to order a

special

with a view to having the case, held as intelligently

possible, but

His Horror dechiied?

BLA

stating

though he could make such

that

an order

he was not bound to. (In this connection

I would call your Lordship's notice to His Honors remarks reported on,

25 of the pamphlet marked D.

case was

page

concluded on

the

The 7. 9th June 1880 and resulted in a verdict.

1880 in a

he

Counsel

of Quilty : His Horror the Chief Justice thereupon indicated to my Mr. Bayllar, a wish that

he might be relieved from the duty of facing sentence. by the prosecution consenting to forego punishment This I refund to do

and

His Honor then sentenced the

Defendant to pay a fine of fifty

Dollars ($50).

later

In his summing up and on in explanation of the leniency of his sentence His Honor, commented upon.

speech

va de

"call

by me at a public meeting of the Hong Hong Chamber of Commerce, referred to in the Libel ( marked I in page 34 of the pamphlet ).

I very respectfully Your Lordship's special attention to these remarks of mine and to the correspondence relating thereto printed pages 44 to 49 of the pamphlet

avv

9.

I have no

hesitation in that the remarks I made at the Chamber of Commerce were

asserting

absolutely true and that they is well known in the Colony

Pitman has undoubted.

are do

daly.

nir

been

John on the most intimate and confidential The Governor, terms with His Excellency

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.